Note, please: this is a post I co-wrote with Ryan Price while interning for CalBike. CalBike is working to mainstream bicycling in California and is really great. Check them out here.

Also, Faulconer won.

Who’s Running for Mayor in San Diego, and Why It Matters

It is crucial that the incoming mayor in San Diego harness the momentum towards a more liveable city. In 2013, San Diegans repeatedly demonstrated that they wanted liveability: DECO Bike Share passed unanimously and $200 million was front-loaded to SANDAG’s bicycle projects, which was the largest investment committed to bike infrastructure in the state.

The two major mayoral candidates, David Alvarez and Kevin Faulconer, are facing the ends of their campaigns– and the race is close. Both candidates have expressed support for smart growth and making San Diego more liveable, and even participated in a Speaker Series hosted by the Livable Streets Coalition. Bike SD has endorsed Alvarez for mayor, and is even organizing a ride for him today. Our affiliate, the San Diego Bicycle Coalition hosted a Q & A with the candidates, but how do David Alvarez and Kevin Faulkner differ on their experience and plans for San Diego’s bikers and walkers?

David Alvarez: the Environmental Leader

 

Experience

Alvarez was born in the Barrio Logan community of San Diego and elected to the City Council as a Democrat in 2010. He is Chair of the Natural Resources & Culture Committee, Vice Chair of the Land Use & Housing Committee, and a member of the Budget & Finance and Rules & Economic Development Committees. As a Councilmember, he has supported affordable housing, including COMM22, a mixed-use transit-oriented development project. He has prioritized infrastructure, such as by improving streetlights and street repair. He has also worked to make San Diego more sustainable by facilitating a coalition to develop the City’s plan for climate change, and working for environmental justice in the polluted neighborhood he comes from.

Mayoral Plans

As mayor, he has specific plans to make San Diego more liveable. He has pledged a commitment to Vision Zero, which is an initiative to eliminate all preventable bicycling and pedestrian deaths with multifaceted political strategies. He promises to make San Diego a sustainable region by keeping SANDAG (San Diego’s regional planning agency) accountable. He has proposed $2.5 million for new parks (as much as 50 urban acres of parkland) and $1 million for bike facilities. He has expressed a commitment to the Pedestrian Master Plan, Transit Oriented Development and Safe Routes to School. As he explained, “We have the opportunity, through smart planning, careful prioritization of resources, and a better long term vision, to rebuild San Diego into the world-class city we know it can be.” He promises to lead the City to get San Diegans passionate about biking and walking.

Kevin Faulconer: The Cycling Rival

 

Experience

Faulconer has been a Republican Councilmember since 2006 and is now the Chair of the Audit Committee. Like Alvarez, he has worked to improve San Diego’s infrastructure, such as by investing in repaving streets, city parks, and improving sidewalks. He championed the North Embarcadero Plan, which will make the waterfront more pedestrian friendly. He supported sustainable investment in city parks, as well as initiatives like Bike Share and the Bayshore Bikeway.

However, BikeSD chose Alvarez over Faulconer, in part, because of how Faulconer bungled bicycling safety in District 2. As BikeSD explains, “board member Nicole Burgess has had the opportunity to work with Faulconer and his staff in addressing barriers to bicycling in District 2 for over three years. However in the three years that Burgess has been involved in advocacy, despite repeatedly highlighting the urgent need to make bicycling safe on Nimitz Boulevard on the three critical blocks between Chatsworth and Wabaska – Faulconer and his team have been unable to direct city staff to make the needed improvements. In fact the improvements that were implemented were not requested by the District 2 bike/pedestrian advisory committee or the Peninsula Community Planning Board.” So can Faulconer be trusted to take necessary action to make San Diego more liveable?

Mayoral Plans

As mayor, Faulconer plans to make sure the Bike Plan is implemented with more dedicated bike lanes. He envisions a city where every resident has the same access to “quality” streets and “safe” neighborhoods.When asked about how he plans to make San Diego more liveable, he responded, “Bottom line, let’s try something. Let’s see some action.”

While Faulconer does not give specifics about how he plans to make San Diego more liveable, he does point out that he is a cyclist.

How close are they?

A Democratic poll from Public Policy Polling showed the race was a dead heat, with Alvarez leading Faulconer by just 0.1%. Other polling, released on the same day by the San Diego Republican party, showed Faulconer leading the race by 13 points. While San Diego has more registered Democrats than Republicans, Republicans tend to vote more in special elections like this one.

Get Out The Vote

February 11th, ride your bike to the polls and vote for the candidate that will do the most to make San Diego the livable city it should be. Being that this is a special election, voter turnout will be low, so your vote is worth so much more. Help out by connecting with Bike San Diego and their efforts, because Getting Out the Vote is crucial for this election.

Follow us on Twitter

Like us on Facebook

Strange Environmental Fact #2: The First Cars in America Were a Scam & a Ruse

While now-a-days there are more cars than people, Americans used to prefer public transportation. The public, including rich urbanites, used to think that owning a car was a nuisance. In the early to mid 20^th century, America was urbanizing fast and the public transit systems were exemplary, with ferries, cable cars, trains, and other forms of fast transport.

 Car and oil executives saw theirs profits taken by good city planning. In response, these companies collaborated to buy out transit lines, which were privately owned and generally fairly cheap. Motor and oil companies replaced the efficient public transportation systems with diesel buses, which were more expensive and less accessible. This takeover was especially wide-spread in California.

Streetcars at a landfill in Los Angeles County, March 1956

America became a country dedicated to cars against its will; the protests of those who loved the old transit system were unsuccessful.

Oil and car companies also convinced the federal government to subsidize a $41 billion national highway project. They collaborated with the military, which needed a complex transit system for national defence. Meanwhile, the newly built suburbs never had access to public transportation.
 

Within a short period of time, Americans embraced the car. Perhaps mass consumption appeals to the American ethos. Or maybe America was merely manipulated that way.

Strange Environmental Fact #1: The Great Smog

You know the “London fog” doesn't really refer to fog? Their “fog” came in a variety of colors, like reddish brown and yellow. That's because it's really smog from industrialization. One time, in 1952, this pollution was so bad that it killed around 12,000 people.

The Great Smog of 1952 happened during a cold snap. To warm up, residents burned huge quantities of coal to power household stoves. This pollution, added to the cumulative emissions of factories, stayed close to the ground, trapped by the warmer air above. It stayed there for five days.

This haziness is not an ancient Instagram filter

Not only was it very hard to breathe, it was hard to see. Visibility dropped from 4 yards to “nil.” People abandoned their cars and walked. Two trains collided. People stayed indoors.

Generally, Londoners were not too worried about the smog. The Times claimed the smog was naturally occurring and as old as Britain itself.

It was not until later that the death toll was announced. Around 4,000 people died during the Smog, while around 8,000 more died soon after.

This was one of the first environmental disasters that caused people to take pollution seriously. Soon after, the British government enacted the Clean Air Act of 1956.

Put More Bacteria in Dirt and Save Lives

Right now, we have a rising population and land that is getting harder to farm.  Could the solution to this food crisis be an overhaul of the composition of dirt?

I live in the East Bay in California, and we've been in a severe drought. I went back to visit my family in Washington, DC and it rained practically every day.

I loved the warm rain and the drama of the thunderstorms, but was definitely caught off guard to experience such different weather from the place where I grew up.


Places that were wet are becoming wetter, and places that were dry are becoming drier, generally. Still, these patterns are wildly unpredictable. The effects of more greenhouse gases in the environment are not immediately felt, and are not uniform across spaces. As the concentrations of CO2 and other gases increase, weather patterns can shift dramatically. Our climate is changing, but it is difficult to know how it will settle.

Remember the Corn Belt Disaster last year?

A Dirty Solution



Farmers in Southern California have been told they will receive between 25-40% of their regular allotment of water this growing season because of the drought.

Biotech corporations like Monsanto have responded to these droughts by creating genetically modified (GMO) crops that require less water. However, these crops will do poorly in wet environments, forcing farmers to divine the weather when choosing seeds.



There may be an invisible solution to these uncertainties. Farming has always been a collaboration between farmer and the soil – a vast community of microbes- to create new life. Scientists have only recently been able to understand the microbial community, called the “agribiome,” with low-cost DNA sequencing and other advances. They are finding that microbes are instrumental in the health of every plant. Changing the location of these microbes could allow crops to adapt to climate change.

Scientists have been studying the microbes that allow other plants to survive in extreme conditions. There is an amazing pair of organisms that can survive in high and low temperature extremes, salinity, and drought around the thermal pools of Yellowstone. When the fungus (Curvularia protuberata) is infected with a heat-tolerant virus and grows together with symbiotic plants such as panic grass, they can survive temperatures of 150 degrees Fahrenheit.

There are many other types of microbes that allow for healthier plants. These microbes could be isolated and given to farmers around the world to help food survive.

Potential Risks/Benefits

Plants already depend on a complex system of microbes to survive. With this solution, we are changing the external environment rather than the internal genetic structure, so this solution is arguably less invasive than GMOs.

Still, like GMOs, its ultimate consequences are unknown. Generally, there are problems of introducing new organisms into an ecosystem; the new microbes may out-compete the other microbes in the agribiome and take over, reducing biodiversity overall. However, this may end up benefiting wild plants, which could also better survive the inconsistent conditions of climate change.  Microbial gel needs to be thoroughly tested in different places to demonstrate long-term and cumulative effects.

While I normally do not support "green" products or technology that goes against natural systems, I believe that the problem that these microbes can solve is dire enough to warrant its use.

The potential benefit of introducing microbes cannot be underestimated. Human population continues to expand, and it is estimated that climate change will cause hundreds of millions of people to become water stressed by the year 2030. The most impoverished people will suffer the most, and it is a tragedy. It is a tragedy that people are dying and will die of starvation because of the extremely skewed distribution of wealth and a lack of compassion for low-income people. If poor farmers around the world gained access to these microbes,  it could save lives.

Unfortunately, spreading these microbes has been reliant on the shitty distribution of scientists, a group of people who seem to be more concerned about one-upping each other “advances” than actually spreading them. Furthermore, many of the fungal/bacterial gels on the market are not regulated and are not effective. Educating farmers around the world about how to use these microbes and which ones are effective is a monumental challenge- but the pay-off could not be higher.

Hey Internet!

I want to explore ways to mitigate the destructive force of climate change.

I want to see justice for the poor people who are the least to blame for climate change but who will likely suffer from it the most.

I want humans to learn from this monumental event. I want us to be more thoughtful in the future.

Thus, in this blog I will write some news, some environmental history, some tips, and some thoughts about this changing environmental and social climate we are now in.

We're all in this together.

<3, Jenna